Some of these purposes were explicitly mentioned in early state constitutions; for example, the Pennsylvania Constitution of 1776 asserted that, "the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the state." During the 1760s pre-revolutionary period, the established colonial militia was composed of colonists, including many who were loyal to British rule.
King George III also began disarming individuals who were in the most rebellious areas in the 1760s and 1770s. British and Loyalist efforts to disarm the colonial Patriot militia armories in the early phases of the American Revolution resulted in the Patriot colonists protesting by citing the Declaration of Rights, Blackstone's summary of the Declaration of Rights, their own militia laws and common law rights to self-defense.
King George III also began disarming individuals who were in the most rebellious areas in the 1760s and 1770s. British and Loyalist efforts to disarm the colonial Patriot militia armories in the early phases of the American Revolution resulted in the Patriot colonists protesting by citing the Declaration of Rights, Blackstone's summary of the Declaration of Rights, their own militia laws and common law rights to self-defense.
Some of these purposes were explicitly mentioned in early state constitutions; for example, the Pennsylvania Constitution of 1776 asserted that, "the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the state." During the 1760s pre-revolutionary period, the established colonial militia was composed of colonists, including many who were loyal to British rule.
They cite examples, such as the Declaration of Independence (describing in 1776 "the Right of the People to...
That a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defence of a free State; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided, as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power. |- | ===Pennsylvania, September 28, 1776=== Article 13.
And by a manipulation through the use of oaths, disqualifying Quaker members, they made up a vast majority of the convention forming the new state constitution; it was only natural that they would assert their efforts to form a compulsory State Militia in the context of a "right" to defend themselves and the state. |- | ===Maryland, November 11, 1776=== Articles XXV-XXVII.
That in all cases, and at all times, the military ought to be under strict subordination to and control of the civil power. |- href="New York (state)" |href="Pennsylvania" | ===North Carolina, December 18, 1776=== A Declaration of Rights.
The right to bear arms was therefore deliberately tied to membership in a militia by the slaveholder and chief drafter of the Amendment, James Madison, because only whites could join militias in the South. In 1776, Thomas Jefferson had submitted a draft constitution for Virginia that said "no freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms within his own lands or tenements".
That the people have a right to bear arms, for the defence of the State; and, as standing armies, in time of peace, are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be kept up; and that the military should be kept under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power. |- | ===New York, April 20, 1777=== Article XL.
And that a proper magazine of warlike stores, proportionate to the number of inhabitants, be, forever hereafter, at the expense of this State, and by acts of the legislature, established, maintained, and continued in every county in this State. |- | ===Vermont, July 8, 1777=== Chapter 1.
That the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of the themselves and the State; and as standing armies, in the time of peace, are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be kept up; and that the military should be kept under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power. |- href="Anti-Federalism" |href="Massachusetts Compromise" | ===Massachusetts, June 15, 1780=== A Declaration of Rights.
institute new Government") and the Constitution of New Hampshire (stating in 1784 that "nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind"). There was an ongoing debate beginning in 1789 about "the people" fighting governmental tyranny (as described by Anti-Federalists); or the risk of mob rule of "the people" (as described by the Federalists) related to the increasingly violent French Revolution.
And as, in time of peace, armies are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be maintained without the consent of the legislature; and the military power shall always be held in an exact subordination to the civil authority and be governed by it. |} ==Drafting and adoption of the Constitution== In March 1785, delegates from Virginia and Maryland assembled at the Mount Vernon Conference to fashion a remedy to the inefficiencies of the Articles of Confederation.
Subsequently, the Constitutional Convention proposed in 1787 to grant Congress exclusive power to raise and support a standing army and navy of unlimited size.
forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition". By January 1788, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia and Connecticut ratified the Constitution without insisting upon amendments.
The Constitution was declared ratified on June 21, 1788, when nine of the original thirteen states had ratified it.
institute new Government") and the Constitution of New Hampshire (stating in 1784 that "nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind"). There was an ongoing debate beginning in 1789 about "the people" fighting governmental tyranny (as described by Anti-Federalists); or the risk of mob rule of "the people" (as described by the Federalists) related to the increasingly violent French Revolution.
James Madison drafted what ultimately became the Bill of Rights, which was proposed by the first Congress on June 8, 1789, and was adopted on December 15, 1791. ==Debates on amending the Constitution== The debate surrounding the Constitution's ratification is of practical importance, particularly to adherents of originalist and strict constructionist legal theories.
According to Picadio, this version was rejected because "it would have given to free blacks the constitutional right to have firearms". ==Conflict and compromise in Congress produce the Bill of Rights== James Madison's initial proposal for a bill of rights was brought to the floor of the House of Representatives on June 8, 1789, during the first session of Congress.
On August 17, that version was read into the Journal: In late August 1789, the House debated and modified the Second Amendment.
It was ratified on December 15, 1791, along with nine other articles of the Bill of Rights.
James Madison drafted what ultimately became the Bill of Rights, which was proposed by the first Congress on June 8, 1789, and was adopted on December 15, 1791. ==Debates on amending the Constitution== The debate surrounding the Constitution's ratification is of practical importance, particularly to adherents of originalist and strict constructionist legal theories.
15, 1791, the Haitian revolution, a successful slave rebellion, was under way.
None is mentioned in the legislation. The first test of the militia system occurred in July 1794, when a group of disaffected Pennsylvania farmers rebelled against federal tax collectors whom they viewed as illegitimate tools of tyrannical power.
Congress did subsequently pass "[a]n act for the erecting and repairing of Arsenals and Magazines" on April 2, 1794, two months prior to the insurrection.
He annotated a five-volume edition of Sir William Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England, a critical legal reference for early American attorneys published in 1803.
Nevertheless, the militia continued to deteriorate and twenty years later, the militia's poor condition contributed to several losses in the War of 1812, including the sacking of Washington, D.C., and the burning of the White House in 1814. In the 20th century, Congress passed the Militia Act of 1903.
Nevertheless, the militia continued to deteriorate and twenty years later, the militia's poor condition contributed to several losses in the War of 1812, including the sacking of Washington, D.C., and the burning of the White House in 1814. In the 20th century, Congress passed the Militia Act of 1903.
Cooley, perhaps the most widely read constitutional scholar of the nineteenth century, wrote extensively about this amendment, and he explained in 1880 how the Second Amendment protected the "right of the people": It might be supposed from the phraseology of this provision that the right to keep and bear arms was only guaranteed to the militia; but this would be an interpretation not warranted by the intent.
Nevertheless, the militia continued to deteriorate and twenty years later, the militia's poor condition contributed to several losses in the War of 1812, including the sacking of Washington, D.C., and the burning of the White House in 1814. In the 20th century, Congress passed the Militia Act of 1903.
King, 2012 WL 1959239 (9th Cir.
At issue in this case was whether the Second Amendment is violated by a provision of the Gun Control Act of 1968 that prohibits possession of a firearm by a person who has been involuntarily committed to a psychiatric hospital.
Burger, a conservative Republican appointed chief justice of the United States by President Richard Nixon, wrote in 1990 following his retirement: The Constitution of the United States, in its Second Amendment, guarantees a "right of the people to keep and bear arms".
We see that the need for a state militia was the predicate of the "right" guaranteed; in short, it was declared "necessary" in order to have a state military force to protect the security of the state. And in 1991 Burger stated: If I were writing the Bill of Rights now, there wouldn't be any such thing as the Second Amendment...
This has been the subject of one of the greatest pieces of fraudI repeat the word 'fraud'on the American public by special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime. In a 1992 opinion piece, six former American attorneys general wrote: For more than 200 years, the federal courts have unanimously determined that the Second Amendment concerns only the arming of the people in service to an organized state militia; it does not guarantee immediate access to guns for private purposes.
Prior to 2001, every circuit court decision that interpreted the Second Amendment endorsed the "collective right" model.
Emerson in 2001, some circuit courts recognized that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to bear arms. The second, known as the "sophisticated collective right model", held that the Second Amendment recognizes some limited individual right.
Circuit denied the follow up appeal of Dick Heller who requested the court to overturn the new District of Columbia gun control ordinances newly enacted after the 2008 Heller ruling.
Hall, On August 4, 2008, the Fourth Circuit upheld as constitutional the prohibition of possession of a concealed weapon without a permit. United States v.
2009)On June 30, 2008, the Fifth Circuit upheld , which bans weapons on postal property, sustaining restrictions on guns outside the home, specifically in private vehicles parked in employee parking lots of government facilities, despite Second Amendment claims that were dismissed.
Rene E., On August 31, 2009, the First Circuit affirmed the conviction of a juvenile for the illegal possession of a handgun as a juvenile, under and , rejecting the defendant's argument that the federal law violated his Second Amendment rights under Heller.
2012)On July 29, 2009, the Ninth Circuit vacated an April 20 panel decision and reheard the case en banc on September 24, 2009.
City of Chicago=== On June 28, 2010, the Court in McDonald v.
23., 25On March 26, 2010, the D.C.
2010)On December 30, 2010, the Fourth Circuit vacated William Chester's conviction for possession of a firearm after having been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence, in violation of .
Scroggins, On March 4, 2010, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the conviction of Ernie Scroggins for possession of a firearm as a convicted felon, in violation of .
After initial favorable rulings in lower court based on a standard of intermediate scrutiny, on July 13, 2010, the Seventh Circuit, sitting en banc, ruled 10–1 against Skoien and reinstated his conviction for a gun violation, citing the strong relation between the law in question and the government objective.
On May 2, 2011, that panel ruled that intermediate scrutiny was the correct standard by which to judge the ordinance's constitutionality and remanded the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
On November 28, 2011, the Ninth Circuit vacated the panel's May2 decision and agreed to rehear the case en banc.
S., at 581." The Michigan Court of Appeals 2012 relied on Heller in the case People v.
County of Westchester, 11-3942On November 28, 2012, the Second Circuit upheld New York's may-issue concealed carry permit law, ruling that "the proper cause requirement is substantially related to New York's compelling interests in public safety and crime prevention." ====Fourth Circuit==== United States v.
Madigan (Circuit docket 12-1269)On December 11, 2012, the Seventh Circuit ruled that the Second Amendment protected a right to keep and bear arms in public for self-defense.
King, 2012 WL 1959239 (9th Cir.
On April 4, 2012, the panel sent the case to mediation.
The panel dismissed the case on June 1, 2012, but only after Alameda County officials changed their interpretation of the challenged ordinance.
On February 22, 2013, a petition for rehearing en banc was denied by a vote of 5–4.
On July 9, 2013, the Illinois General Assembly, overriding Governor Quinn's veto, passed a law permitting the concealed carrying of firearms. ====Ninth Circuit==== Nordyke v.
Sheriff's Dept., On December 18, 2014, the Sixth Circuit ruled that strict scrutiny should be applied to firearms regulations when regulations burden "conduct that falls within the scope of the Second Amendment right, as historically understood".
On September 18, 2015, the D.C.
On April 21, 2015, the Sixth Circuit voted to rehear the case en banc, thereby vacating the December 18 opinion. ====Seventh Circuit==== United States v.
Massachusetts=== On March 21, 2016, in a per curiam decision the Court vacated a Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decision upholding the conviction of a woman who carried a stun gun for self-defense.
2016)On February 4, 2016, the Fourth Circuit vacated a U.S.
On March 4, 2016, the court agreed to rehear the case en banc on May 11, 2016. ====Fifth Circuit==== United States v.
County of Alameda, (Circuit docket 13-17132)On May 16, 2016, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the right to keep and bear arms included being able to buy and sell firearms.
2016), (Circuit docket 13-17132)On June 9, 2016, pertaining to the legality of San Diego County's restrictive policy regarding requiring documentation of "good cause" before issuing a concealed carry permit, the Ninth Circuit upheld the policy, finding that "there is no Second Amendment right for members of the general public to carry concealed firearms in public." Young v.
16-7025On July 25, 2017, the D.C.
City of New York, New York on December 2, 2019, to decide whether a New York City ordinance that prevents the transport of guns, even if properly unloaded and locked in containers, from within city limits to outside of the city limits is unconstitutional.
However, as the city had changed its rule to allow transport while the case was under consideration by the Court, the Court ruled the case moot in April 2020, though it remanded the case so the lower courts could review the new rules under the petitioners new claims. ===New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc.
The Supreme Court granted certiorari on April 26, 2021, but limited the scope of its review to "whether the state of New York's denial of petitioners' applications for concealed-carry licenses for self-defense violated the Second Amendment." ==United States Courts of Appeals decisions before and after Heller== ===Before Heller=== Until District of Columbia v.
2021)An en banc ruling of the Ninth Circuit on March 26, 2021 upheld the validity of Hawaii's law that barred open carry of guns outside of one's home without a license.
All text is taken from Wikipedia. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License .
Page generated on 2021-08-05